Hello, One more question is how to solve the PIA problem with the automatic registration of the component based registry? This "import me, then you'll have it" bite us regularly. I think this is definitely bad design. Monday, January 11, 2010, 4:31:57 PM, you wrote: R> Hi Hanno
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Hanno Schlichting [mailto:hanno@hannosch.eu] Gesendet: Montag, 11. Januar 2010 15:45 An: dev@projekt01.ch Cc: zope-dev Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] vocabularies missing wihtout zope.app.schema
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Roger <dev@projekt01.ch> wrote:
Which concept should the ZTK use? The plain vocabulary from zope.schema.vocabulary or the enhanced component lookupbased concept defined in zope.app.schema.vocabulary?
Any idea how zope.componentvocabulary fits into this?
R> The zope.componentvocabulary package defines some R> basic vocabulary (factory) classes. Probably we R> should move the zope/app/schema/vocabulary.py R> to this package as registry.py. R> The question is, does someone like to use a non component R> based vocabulary registry? Was that the reason that the R> vocabulary registry was not moved from zope.app.schema? R> I guess not, right? R> Regards R> Roger Ineichen
Hanno
R> _______________________________________________ R> Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org R> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev R> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** R> (Related lists - R> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce R> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) -- Best regards, Adam GROSZER mailto:agroszer@gmail.com -- Quote of the day: Learn to say no. It will be of more use to you than to be able to read Latin. - Charles Haddon Spurgeon