16 Dec
2001
16 Dec
'01
2:38 p.m.
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 14:21:04 +0000:
Kyler@Lairds.com wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:43:45 -0500 (EST):
I've found that it would be very useful to be able to define groups of users and then grant a local role to that group rather than individual users.
A role is essentially a group.
I think the general consensus is that a role is not essentially a group although the two can be easily confused ;-)
If you have a role, you're in a group - the group of all people with that role. My apologies for having included the world in my reply. I was thinking that I was replying to a more limited group. --kyler