-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:01:35AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Charlie Clark <charlie.clark@clark-consulting.eu> wrote:
what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0? I put that info into the "post scriptum" of my mail.
Have I missed a mail with more failures? I would have thought getting those tests to pass for a release is a reasonable aim. You have. It's only "bin/test-ztk" that passes. bin/test-zopeapp still has a number of failures. There is also the zope.testing failure where a doctest tries to drive the pdb module: 2.7 added a new intermediate (private) method to the call stack in unittest's 'assertEqual', which causes that test to fail.
That shouldn't be too difficult to fix; zope.testing already uses quite a few regexp-based renormalizers to hide traceback elements that differ in different Python versions.
(Debugging those is a pain, though.)
Can't be renormalized, as the pdb session requires sending an extra 'u' to get to the expected stack frame (it's a dumb test, FWIW). Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkw854MACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4nSACg0y6g7ZuAJaw7H3nFAFqBWAws FvAAnjEaVCDoEhl/XzivN8XgTVfl7Qnu =8ERm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----