19 Jun
2008
19 Jun
'08
12:41 p.m.
Tres Seaver wrote:
Christian Theune wrote: [snip]
My preference would be to have more important changes first.
Please don't make it a judgement call: keep it time-descending order, just like the releases. Among other things, this makes merge conflicts more obvious, and easier to to fix.
With time-descending order you mean add more recent fixes to the top of the section, right? Where 'section' is probably the 'bug fixes' or 'features' section per release. Regards, Martijn