Hi Jim
Yeah I meant my ugly hacks getting rid of the 'c' in zope.proxy and zope.security
aren't going to get supported by anyone, whereas having a supported way of substituting proxies and security would be great. All the import dependancies that existed when I went through the excercise meant ugly hacks was about all I could come up with.
The refactoring going on at the moment is fantastic.
T
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I think Tim was referring to his mangled version of zope.proxy (no C
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2009, at 7:11 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
>
>> Big +1 from me on this.
>
> Cool.
>
>> I had to do a whole lot of hacks to get this stuff running on app
>> engine and basically
>> had to gut zope.proxy which was ugly
>
> How so?
>
>> and obviously unsupported.
>
> I don't think so. What makes you think it's unsupported.
extensions, to allow running on GAE).
Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFKP4WJ+gerLs4ltQ4RAi4IAJwM3/1FoX027kHSQKTzNCW0qYewJACdFQ+4
tRgPtbJCmsMed1HNugqk9os=
=znBD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )