15 Oct
2003
15 Oct
'03
12:24 p.m.
Chris Withers wrote:
Casey Duncan wrote:
I would argue that a better plan would be to only use _v_ vars for completely disposable data only. The application should expect that this values will be gone at any random time, not just at transaction boundaries.
Agreed. Are there any situations, apart from the already discussed CMF skindata, where this currently isn't the case?
I'm a bit puzzled - of what use is a variable which may disappear "at any random time"? seb