9 Oct
2003
9 Oct
'03
6:52 p.m.
Chris Withers wrote at 2003-10-8 21:22 +0100:
Casey Duncan wrote:
I would argue that a better plan would be to only use _v_ vars for completely disposable data only. The application should expect that this values will be gone at any random time, not just at transaction boundaries.
I agree with this. How do we go about find code that uses the assumption that _v_ stuff won't change unless it's at a transaction boundary?
This will invalidate many current uses: * use for database connections * use for skin data * ... Dieter