18 Jun
2008
18 Jun
'08
3:20 p.m.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Christophe Combelles <ccomb@free.fr> wrote:
The risk is that people will think the bug is fixed in 3.6.0 and not in the 3.5 branch.
That's a general documentation risk, and I don't think anyone else has come up with a better way to deal with this. If you can find an example that solves this without excess burden on the maintainers, that would be really good to hear about. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller