Is there anybody who thinks this is a bad idea?
Great idea, but this could also be a chance to fix the windows z2.py thang and the installer ;) As long as standalone Zope without ZEO would still be a startup option, Im sure there are more things out there like the Plone Controller that might take a while to catch up. -- Andy McKay www.agmweb.ca ----- Original Message ----- From: "Guido van Rossum" <guido@python.org> To: <zope-dev@zope.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:26 AM Subject: [Zope-dev] Integrating ZEO with Zope 2.7
We're close to finishing a new version of ZEO, which will be released as part of the next ZODB3 release (formerly StandaloneZODB).
I think this would be a good opportunity to make ZEO a standard part of Zope, starting with Zope 2.7.
Advantage for users: if you download Zope, you have everything you need; you don't have to find and download a separate ZEO or ZODB release.
Advantage for Zope developers: no need to test and maintain a separate ZEO release.
There will still be a separate ZODB3 release, which will include ZEO. We have to do this anyway, for people who want to use ZODB outside Zope.
Is there anybody who thinks this is a bad idea?
(Full disclosure: Brian & Jim think it's a good idea, as long as we make sure that the ZEO that goes into the Zope 2.7 release is properly documented from the sysadmin POV, i.e. how to start/stop/configure. Of course we'll do this.)
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )