I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex from Plone in Zope 2.8. It offers some the nice extension to limit the depth of the search and improves building navigation-trees or similar structures. Opinions? Andreas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Jung wrote:
I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex from Plone in Zope 2.8. It offers some the nice extension to limit the depth of the search and improves building navigation-trees or similar structures. Opinions?
I doubt many folks on this list know the code that well. Are you thinking to lift the features you mention, making them part of the regular PathIndex? Also, what is the IP status of the code? Tres. - -- =============================================================== Tres Seaver tseaver@zope.com Zope Corporation "Zope Dealers" http://www.zope.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCVSDhGqWXf00rNCgRAklQAJ0WH6k23gjaEroC7MoTC1pN/kSaFQCeJ9vg GaRdPAEOYOa0D0eac17VmoQ= =ulEx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--On Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 8:00 Uhr -0400 Tres Seaver <tseaver@zope.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I doubt many folks on this list know the code that well. Are you thinking to lift the features you mention, making them part of the regular PathIndex? Also, what is the IP status of the code?
It extends the PathIndex and has a different behaviour. So making the functionality part of the existing PathIndex would break the exisiting behaviour therefore it should be included as second path index. The license is BSD or ZPL but not GPL :-) Andreas
--On Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 8:00 Uhr -0400 Tres Seaver <tseaver@zope.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex from Plone in Zope 2.8. It offers some the nice extension to limit the depth of the search and improves building navigation-trees or similar structures. Opinions?
I doubt many folks on this list know the code that well. Are you thinking to lift the features you mention, making them part of the regular PathIndex?
I succeeded in merging the ExtendedPathIndex code with the existing PathIndex code without changing the existing behaviour (means all original tests + the new tests) pass. Andreas
Andreas Jung <lists@andreas-jung.com> wrote:
I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex from Plone in Zope 2.8. It offers some the nice extension to limit the depth of the search and improves building navigation-trees or similar structures. Opinions?
+1 if it's a separate new index (don't change the existing PathIndex). Does it provide a way of cataloging the ordering of children? Otherwise I don't see how you can build navigation tree using it (unless you don't care about ordering of course). Florent -- Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of R&D +33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com fg@nuxeo.com
Andreas Jung wrote:
I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex from Plone in Zope 2.8. It offers some the nice extension to limit the depth of the search and improves building navigation-trees or similar structures. Opinions?
While the feature sounds cool, I tend to be a bit worried about delaying the Zope 2.8 release with this, though of course I shouldn't shout so loudly as we just added in Five. Then again, we had significant numbers of people working on that for the biggest part of a week... Regards, Martijn
--On Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 14:49 Uhr +0200 Martijn Faassen <faassen@infrae.com> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex from Plone in Zope 2.8. It offers some the nice extension to limit the depth of the search and improves building navigation-trees or similar structures. Opinions?
While the feature sounds cool, I tend to be a bit worried about delaying the Zope 2.8 release with this,
Why delaying? -aj
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 14:49 Uhr +0200 Martijn Faassen <faassen@infrae.com> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex from Plone in Zope 2.8. It offers some the nice extension to limit the depth of the search and improves building navigation-trees or similar structures. Opinions?
While the feature sounds cool, I tend to be a bit worried about delaying the Zope 2.8 release with this,
Why delaying?
Adding any features could delay the release, right? Perhaps this one is really easy so it won't introduce a large risk of delay; I can't evaluate that. Regards, Martijn
--On Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 20:15 Uhr +0200 Martijn Faassen <faassen@infrae.com> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 14:49 Uhr +0200 Martijn Faassen <faassen@infrae.com> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex from Plone in Zope 2.8. It offers some the nice extension to limit the depth of the search and improves building navigation-trees or similar structures. Opinions?
While the feature sounds cool, I tend to be a bit worried about delaying the Zope 2.8 release with this,
Why delaying?
Adding any features could delay the release, right? Perhaps this one is really easy so it won't introduce a large risk of delay; I can't evaluate that.
Don't worry...everything's under control :-) Except the 2.8.a2 release almost all my releases where on the track. Andreas
participants (4)
-
Andreas Jung -
Florent Guillaume -
Martijn Faassen -
Tres Seaver