There are some discussions in the grok and bluebream lists about the opportunity to upgrade to buildout 1.5, as it will provide *isolation without virtualenv*, so it should facilitate installations and deployments. Is it too late for the ZTK 1.0? Is it worth at least trying to see what it does? Christophe
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Christophe Combelles <ccomb@free.fr> wrote:
There are some discussions in the grok and bluebream lists about the opportunity to upgrade to buildout 1.5, as it will provide *isolation without virtualenv*, so it should facilitate installations and deployments.
Is it too late for the ZTK 1.0? Is it worth at least trying to see what it does?
I don't want to see zc.buildout 1.5 in the ZTK 1.0. There's tons of recipes out there based on zc.recipe.egg which all have a good chance of needing adjustments. Right now I just want to get a stable ZTK 1.0 out and not add any new features to it. We have the trunk open for development. Hanno
HS> Right now I just want to get a stable ZTK 1.0 out and not add any new HS> features to it. We have the trunk open for development. +1 -- Best regards, Adam GROSZER mailto:agroszer@gmail.com -- Quote of the day: Rainy days and Mondays always get me down.
On Friday, September 17, 2010, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Right now I just want to get a stable ZTK 1.0 out and not add any new features to it. We have the trunk open for development.
+1 zc.buildout 1.5 caused great pain here at work! I have worked with Gary to rectify the problems, but I would still prefer no feature release changes in the ZTK now. Regards, Stephan -- Entrepreneur and Software Geek Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter"
participants (4)
-
Adam GROSZER -
Christophe Combelles -
Hanno Schlichting -
Stephan Richter