I have posted a tenative release plan for ZODB 3.2 in the ZODB Wiki at http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ZODB%203.2%20Release There are a small set of proposed features centering around better configuration and management of ZEO and ZODB. Feedback is welcome. Jeremy
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 02:04:35PM -0500, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
I have posted a tenative release plan for ZODB 3.2 in the ZODB Wiki at http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ZODB%203.2%20Release
There are a small set of proposed features centering around better configuration and management of ZEO and ZODB.
I'm happy to see SecureZEO listed, and me and Johan can put up some good time to work on this for 3.2. Do we have a plan on what needs to be done, or should we draw one up? The main issues I can see are: offering plaintext versus a CHAP-like implementation, and how to store the passwords on the server-side. Anybody see anything else that needs catering? Take care, -- Christian Reis, Senior Engineer, Async Open Source, Brazil. http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 | NMFL
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 7:04 pm, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
There are a small set of proposed features centering around better configuration and management of ZEO and ZODB.
Feedback is welcome.
Not explicitly mentioned on that list, but improved logging is tied up with better daemon support. I think Chris M has been looking at zope logging recently - Im not sure if that work could be applied to ZEO too.
There are a small set of proposed features centering around better configuration and management of ZEO and ZODB.
Feedback is welcome.
Not explicitly mentioned on that list, but improved logging is tied up with better daemon support. I think Chris M has been looking at zope logging recently - Im not sure if that work could be applied to ZEO too.
I'm not sure how daemon support and better logging are tied together? I was thinking of letting the daemon manager use zLOG just like everybody else. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 7:04 pm, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
I have posted a tenative release plan for ZODB 3.2 in the ZODB Wiki at http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ZODB%203.2%20Release
There are a small set of proposed features centering around better configuration and management of ZEO and ZODB.
Is 3.2 work happing on the trunk or a branch?
"TD" == Toby Dickenson <tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com> writes:
>> I have posted a tenative release plan for ZODB 3.2 in the ZODB >> Wiki at http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ZODB%203.2%20Release >> There are a small set of proposed features centering around >> better configuration and management of ZEO and ZODB. TD> Is 3.2 work happing on the trunk or a branch? Trunk. -Barry
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 7:04 pm, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
I have posted a tenative release plan for ZODB 3.2 in the ZODB Wiki at http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ZODB%203.2%20Release
There are a small set of proposed features centering around better configuration and management of ZEO and ZODB.
Is 3.2 work happing on the trunk or a branch?
I presume it's going on the trunk. Is there a problem with that? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
"TD" == Toby Dickenson <tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com> writes:
TD> On Tuesday 05 November 2002 7:04 pm, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
I have posted a tenative release plan for ZODB 3.2 in the ZODB Wiki at http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ZODB%203.2%20Release
There are a small set of proposed features centering around better configuration and management of ZEO and ZODB.
TD> Is 3.2 work happing on the trunk or a branch? It's happening where it's happening. Guido is doing the zdaemon stuff on the trunk. I've been working on the deadlock code on a branch, but I'll merge that to the trunk soon. This is the standard Zope development practice -- keep the trunk stable. Jeremy
participants (6)
-
barry＠zope.com -
Christian Reis -
Guido van Rossum -
Jeremy Hylton -
jeremy＠zope.com
-
Toby Dickenson