RE: [Zope-dev] ANNOUNCE: The Instance Product Patch
Gregor wrote:
I wonder if there is support for adding something like an optional LOCAL_HOME. If not, the package maintainers will have to add them unofficially.
Scott Robertson had sent us some patches related to this that unfortunately are going to take some bandwidth to think about. Supporting previous database, where the pickles have the paths to the modules recorded in them, is apparently tricky business. Until then, feel free to experiment with Scott's patches and see what you folks think. --Paul
On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Paul Everitt wrote:
Gregor wrote:
I wonder if there is support for adding something like an optional LOCAL_HOME. If not, the package maintainers will have to add them unofficially.
Scott Robertson had sent us some patches related to this that unfortunately are going to take some bandwidth to think about. Supporting previous database, where the pickles have the paths to the modules recorded in them, is apparently tricky business.
Until then, feel free to experiment with Scott's patches and see what you folks think.
Is anyone trying to take this a step further and roll individual instances into a single DB and server instance? Or am I the only person who thinks that would be useful, and I should just get off my butt and try it myself? Mike. -- --- | Mike Pelletier Work: 519-746-1607 /opeware! | Software Developer Home: 519-725-7710 --- | mike@zopeware.com Fax: 519-746-7566 http://www.zopeware.com | Zopeware is not endorsed by Digital Creations
On Tue, Mar 23, 1999 at 11:19:28AM -0500, Mike Pelletier wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Paul Everitt wrote:
Scott Robertson had sent us some patches related to this that unfortunately are going to take some bandwidth to think about. Supporting previous database, where the pickles have the paths to the modules recorded in them, is apparently tricky business.
Until then, feel free to experiment with Scott's patches and see what you folks think.
Is anyone trying to take this a step further and roll individual instances into a single DB and server instance? Or am I the only person who thinks that would be useful, and I should just get off my butt and try it myself?
I think it would be neat to be able to piece together udner ZServer a single "view" of multiple databases, but I don't think I'd want mutliple instances in the same database... no that sounds bad. I do think that it would be nice to have multiple instances under teh same ZServer though. Chris -- | Christopher Petrilli ``Television is bubble-gum for | petrilli@amber.org the mind.''-Frank Lloyd Wright
On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Christopher Petrilli wrote:
I think it would be neat to be able to piece together udner ZServer a single "view" of multiple databases, but I don't think I'd want mutliple instances in the same database... no that sounds bad. I do think that it would be nice to have multiple instances under teh same ZServer though.
I've always wanted the capability to mount multiple databases into one huge tree. For ease of management. --------------------------------------------------- - Scott Robertson Phone: 714.972.2299 - - CodeIt Computing Fax: 714.972.2399 - - http://codeit.com - ---------------------------------------------------
On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Paul Everitt wrote:
Gregor wrote:
I wonder if there is support for adding something like an optional LOCAL_HOME. If not, the package maintainers will have to add them unofficially.
Scott Robertson had sent us some patches related to this that unfortunately are going to take some bandwidth to think about. Supporting previous database, where the pickles have the paths to the modules recorded in them, is apparently tricky business.
Until then, feel free to experiment with Scott's patches and see what you folks think.
The patches definatly fall under the 'quick hack' catagorey so feedback is definatly encouraged. --------------------------------------------------- - Scott Robertson Phone: 714.972.2299 - - CodeIt Computing Fax: 714.972.2399 - - http://codeit.com - ---------------------------------------------------
participants (4)
-
Christopher Petrilli -
Mike Pelletier -
Paul Everitt -
Scott Robertson