RE: [Zope-dev] RE: Barriers to Zope popularity: Part 2: source co ntrol
-----Original Message----- From: Chris Withers [mailto:chrisw@nipltd.com] Sent: Tuesday, 25 September 2001 10:59 PM To: Jay, Dylan Cc: 'zope-dev@zope.org' Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] RE: Barriers to Zope popularity: Part 2: source control
"Jay, Dylan" wrote:
Zope looks nice but I found it has two potential problems.
1. WYSIWYG editing
ZPT, WebDAV, etc
Yes, I pointed these out as the solution in my email.
2. Source control (by ClearCase)
Well, I just used FS-based CMF skins and python Products maintained with CVS to control the 'code'. I don't believe 'data' should ever be put under the kind of source control you're talking about here...
The discussion was about over-the-web code such as DTML, ZPT, ZClasses. Many sites (including most I've done) are mainly over-the-web code. I also agree that 'data' should not be source controlled (although I could see some content management applications where this distinction could get kind of murky).
2. Source control (by ClearCase)
Well, I just used FS-based CMF skins and python Products maintained with CVS to control the 'code'. I don't believe 'data' should ever be put under the kind of source control you're talking about here...
The discussion was about over-the-web code such as DTML, ZPT, ZClasses. Many sites (including most I've done) are mainly over-the-web code.
Why? If you want to edit 'over the web' (you mean 'over the net'), then FTP into the box and edit the FS-based skins that way. Ange-FTP in EMACS rules :-) If you need to quickly make a change, use the skin customisation feature. cheers, Chris PS: Anyone using DTML or ZClasses for this kind of thing in this day and age should be shot ;-)
On Tue, 2001-09-25 at 18:16, Chris Withers wrote:
PS: Anyone using DTML or ZClasses for this kind of thing in this day and age should be shot ;-)
Personally, I think all extremists and fanatics should be shot. Oh yeah, I forgot, ;-) Michael.
participants (3)
-
Chris Withers -
Jay, Dylan -
Michael R. Bernstein