Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: Zope/trunk/versions.cfg Revert r101557 and put back version pins for zodbcode and zope.app.interface. These are actual dependencies of zope.app.zcmlfiles, which in turn is a test dependency of numerous packages we use. Having a consistent known set of packages for tests is as important as having one for production.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Log message for revision 101616: Revert r101557 and put back version pins for zodbcode and zope.app.interface. These are actual dependencies of zope.app.zcmlfiles, which in turn is a test dependency of numerous packages we use. Having a consistent known set of packages for tests is as important as having one for production.
Shouldn't we just rip zodbcode et al out of a new version of zcmlfiles? Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKUpdu+gerLs4ltQ4RAiTyAKDbLJUCqtzAr60SJbtrZIw21GXGJQCfTbB5 tJsphRvfvTBTU/ejJX/OGFk= =K7Li -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Tres Seaver wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Log message for revision 101616: Revert r101557 and put back version pins for zodbcode and zope.app.interface. These are actual dependencies of zope.app.zcmlfiles, which in turn is a test dependency of numerous packages we use. Having a consistent known set of packages for tests is as important as having one for production.
Shouldn't we just rip zodbcode et al out of a new version of zcmlfiles?
+1 Shane
participants (2)
-
Shane Hathaway -
Tres Seaver