Hi! I've been wondering if there is a way to specify the initialisation order of products? Or is there some defined order already? This would be important for Products that enhance existing Products. (For this scenario, a function "Require_Product(name)" would be most beneficial.) Andreas -- Andreas Kostyrka | andreas@mtg.co.at phone: +43/1/7070750 | phone: +43/676/4091256 MTG Handelsges.m.b.H. | fax: +43/1/7065299 Raiffeisenstr. 16/9 | 2320 Zwoelfaxing AUSTRIA
In article <Pine.LNX.4.10.9908241833460.3968-100000@gatekeeper.zwax.mtg. co.at>, Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@mtg.co.at> writes
Hi!
I've been wondering if there is a way to specify the initialisation order of products? Or is there some defined order already?
This would be important for Products that enhance existing Products. (For this scenario, a function "Require_Product(name)" would be most beneficial.)
what's wrong with "import name"?
Andreas -- Andreas Kostyrka | andreas@mtg.co.at phone: +43/1/7070750 | phone: +43/676/4091256 MTG Handelsges.m.b.H. | fax: +43/1/7065299 Raiffeisenstr. 16/9 | 2320 Zwoelfaxing AUSTRIA
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
(To receive general Zope announcements, see: http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
For non-developer, user-level issues, zope@zope.org, http://www.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
-- Robin Becker
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Robin Becker wrote:
In article <Pine.LNX.4.10.9908241833460.3968-100000@gatekeeper.zwax.mtg. co.at>, Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@mtg.co.at> writes
Hi!
I've been wondering if there is a way to specify the initialisation order of products? Or is there some defined order already?
This would be important for Products that enhance existing Products. (For this scenario, a function "Require_Product(name)" would be most beneficial.)
what's wrong with "import name"? Well, does it work this way? ;) (if so, I've just again proved that I classify in "dummy users")
Andreas -- Andreas Kostyrka | andreas@mtg.co.at phone: +43/1/7070750 | phone: +43/676/4091256 MTG Handelsges.m.b.H. | fax: +43/1/7065299 Raiffeisenstr. 16/9 | 2320 Zwoelfaxing AUSTRIA
In article <Pine.LNX.4.10.9908242038520.11567-100000@gatekeeper.zwax.mtg .co.at>, Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@mtg.co.at> writes
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Robin Becker wrote:
In article <Pine.LNX.4.10.9908241833460.3968-100000@gatekeeper.zwax.mtg. co.at>, Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@mtg.co.at> writes
Hi!
I've been wondering if there is a way to specify the initialisation order of products? Or is there some defined order already?
This would be important for Products that enhance existing Products. (For this scenario, a function "Require_Product(name)" would be most beneficial.)
what's wrong with "import name"? Well, does it work this way? ;) (if so, I've just again proved that I classify in "dummy users")
Andreas -- Andreas Kostyrka | andreas@mtg.co.at phone: +43/1/7070750 | phone: +43/676/4091256 MTG Handelsges.m.b.H. | fax: +43/1/7065299 Raiffeisenstr. 16/9 | 2320 Zwoelfaxing AUSTRIA
no in general not. I just meant that 'import name' would have to be there in some way anyhow and provides a method for more special tools to figure out the dependency. -- Robin Becker
participants (2)
-
Andreas Kostyrka -
Robin Becker