Chimezie Thomas-Ogbuji <cogbuji@fourthought.com> wrote:

you should be able to append <dtml-var id> to the absolute_url() method call. Althought I'm not sure if it that will append the id of the containing object or the id of the DTMLmethod itself (if it's the latter then that should work for you). So this is what you want:

absolute_url() + "/" + <dtml-var id>

Actually, DTML methods don't expose their own 'id' (under that name), but that of their acquisition context. You need to use 'document_id' for what you want:: absolute_url() + "/" + <dtml-var document_id>

Chimezie

Christian Scholz wrote:

...

Hi!

On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 10:27:56AM -0700, David Brown wrote:

...

Why is it that when I call absolute_url() on a DTML Method, I get the URL of the enclosing container, not the DTML Method within that container?

I think (but I am a newbie) that's the difference between dtml methods and documents. Methods simply act as methods to the containing folder and document are "real" objects. Thus moving from a method to a document should change this behaviour.

...

Is there an equivalent method that will give me the real location of the DTML Method?

Well, this I actually don't know..

Tres. -- ========================================================= Tres Seaver tseaver@digicool.com tseaver@palladion.com