Hello! I cannot remember much discussion about mod_pcgi. Is it possible that I am one or one of 2 or 3 people that want to use such module? Currently I am not using Andrew's mod_pcgi 'cause I need virtual hosting. I am about to start to write new version of mod_pcgi. It seems that I cannot use mod_pcgi, I will write new one from scratch. If anyone interested - I am open for discussion before I started to write actual code. Oleg. ---- Oleg Broytmann Foundation for Effective Policies phd@phd.russ.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
Oleg Broytmann writes:
I cannot remember much discussion about mod_pcgi. Is it possible that I am one or one of 2 or 3 people that want to use such module? Currently I am not using Andrew's mod_pcgi 'cause I need virtual hosting.
Some DC people have reported that they'll be using FastCGI, which already has an Apache module. If that's the case, then probably PCGI will slowly be replaced by FastCGI, and mod_pcgi becomes irrelevant. (I like it when projects become irrelevant, and the maintenance burden shifts to other people, so this is a good thing.) -- A.M. Kuchling http://starship.python.net/crew/amk/ Recipe for Loon Soup: Do not make loon soup. -- _The Eskimo Cookbook_ (1967)
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Andrew M. Kuchling wrote:
Some DC people have reported that they'll be using FastCGI, which already has an Apache module. If that's the case, then probably PCGI will slowly be replaced by FastCGI, and mod_pcgi becomes irrelevant.
FastCGI is essentially incompatible with Russian Apache (search through mail lists to find my discussion with Jeff Bauer what is Russian Apache and how to make mod_zope compatible)... Oleg. ---- Oleg Broytmann Foundation for Effective Policies phd@phd.russ.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
participants (2)
-
Andrew M. Kuchling -
Oleg Broytmann