zope-tests - FAILED: 11, OK: 15, UNKNOWN: 4
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2013-02-18 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-02-19 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- [1] FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.8 : Linux [2] FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-2.13 Python-2.7.3 : Linux [3] FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.8 : Linux [4] FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.7.3 : Linux [5] Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 178 [6] Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk_app - Build # 160 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.8 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [7] winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32 [8] winbot / z3c.layer.ready2go_py_265_32 [9] winbot / z3c.tabular_py_265_32 [10] winbot / zope.deprecation_py_265_32 [11] winbot / zope.event_py_265_32 [12] winbot / zope.i18nmessageid_py_265_32 [13] winbot / zope.interface_py_265_32 [14] winbot / zope.schema_py_265_32 [15] winbot / zope.security_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.8 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072605.html [2] UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-2.13 Python-2.7.3 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072606.html [3] UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.8 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072607.html [4] UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.7.3 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072608.html [5] FAILED Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 178 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072600.html [6] FAILED Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk_app - Build # 160 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072601.html [7] FAILED winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072623.html [8] FAILED winbot / z3c.layer.ready2go_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072628.html [9] FAILED winbot / z3c.tabular_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072622.html [10] FAILED winbot / zope.deprecation_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072621.html [11] FAILED winbot / zope.event_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072627.html [12] FAILED winbot / zope.i18nmessageid_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072624.html [13] FAILED winbot / zope.interface_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072626.html [14] FAILED winbot / zope.schema_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072625.html [15] FAILED winbot / zope.security_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072599.html
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +0000, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2013-02-18 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-02-19 00:00:00 UTC:
I finally got tired of clicking at the links by hand and wrote a script: https://gist.github.com/mgedmin/4995950 It gives me output like this: http://zope3.pov.lt/zope-tests-2013-02-20.html
[1] UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.8 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072605.html
Failure in test test_menu (Products.Five.browser.tests.test_menu) Failed example: pprint(menu[1]) Expected: {'action': u'@@cockatiel_menu_public.html', ... Got: {'action': '@@cockatiel_menu_public.html', ... Failure in test /home/stefan/autotest/temp/python26-zope213all/src/Products/Five/browser/tests/pages.txt Failed example: page.__name__ Expected: u'eagle.txt' Got: 'eagle.txt'
[2] UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-2.13 Python-2.7.3 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072606.html
Same two failures.
[3] UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.8 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072607.html
Same two failures.
[4] UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.7.3 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072608.html
Same two failures.
[5] FAILED Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 178 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072600.html
Error: Picked: BTrees = 4.0.5 So now zope.annotation requires BTrees, which is not part of the ZTK. Two options: * pin zope.annotation to an older branch that didn't require BTrees * add BTrees and the other exploded-ZODB3-packages to the ZTK, switch ZODB3 from the 3.10 branch to trunk
[6] FAILED Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk_app - Build # 160 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072601.html
Same.
[7] FAILED winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072623.html
Same incomprehensible HTML diff. Adam ran it by hand with --ndiff on winbot and reported that the difference is a different ordering of id and menu attributes on the outer <form> element: Expected: <form ... name="contents" id="contents"> Actual: <form ... id="contents" name="contents"> I'd like to know why I can't reproduce this locally. This could be caused by changes in zope.tal 4.0.0a1: it outputs dynamic attributes in alphabetical order (instead of dictionary iteration order), but this should cause the same failure on all platforms, not just Windows.
[8] FAILED winbot / z3c.layer.ready2go_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072628.html
Same.
[9] FAILED winbot / z3c.tabular_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072622.html
Same.
[10] FAILED winbot / zope.deprecation_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072621.html
Moved to github, zope.wineggbuilder needs an update.
[11] FAILED winbot / zope.event_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072627.html
Moved to github, zope.wineggbuilder needs an update.
[12] FAILED winbot / zope.i18nmessageid_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072624.html
Moved to github, zope.wineggbuilder needs an update.
[13] FAILED winbot / zope.interface_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072626.html
Moved to github, zope.wineggbuilder needs an update.
[14] FAILED winbot / zope.schema_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072625.html
Moved to github, zope.wineggbuilder needs an update.
[15] FAILED winbot / zope.security_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072599.html
Latest build is all green. Marius Gedminas -- http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 04:48:56PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +0000, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
[10] FAILED winbot / zope.deprecation_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072621.html
Moved to github, zope.wineggbuilder needs an update.
[11] FAILED winbot / zope.event_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072627.html
Moved to github, zope.wineggbuilder needs an update.
[12] FAILED winbot / zope.i18nmessageid_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072624.html
Moved to github, zope.wineggbuilder needs an update.
[13] FAILED winbot / zope.interface_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072626.html
Moved to github, zope.wineggbuilder needs an update.
[14] FAILED winbot / zope.schema_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072625.html
Moved to github, zope.wineggbuilder needs an update.
[15] FAILED winbot / zope.security_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072599.html
All of these were updated in zope.wineggbuilder (not by me), so I'm assuming winbot merely needs an svn up and a buildbot reconfig. Marius Gedminas -- http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development
On Feb 20, 2013, at 15:48 , Marius Gedminas <marius@gedmin.as> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +0000, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2013-02-18 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-02-19 00:00:00 UTC:
I finally got tired of clicking at the links by hand and wrote a script: https://gist.github.com/mgedmin/4995950
It gives me output like this: http://zope3.pov.lt/zope-tests-2013-02-20.html
[1] UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.8 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072605.html
Failure in test test_menu (Products.Five.browser.tests.test_menu)
Failed example: pprint(menu[1]) Expected: {'action': u'@@cockatiel_menu_public.html', ... Got: {'action': '@@cockatiel_menu_public.html', ...
Failure in test /home/stefan/autotest/temp/python26-zope213all/src/Products/Five/browser/tests/pages.txt
Failed example: page.__name__ Expected: u'eagle.txt' Got: 'eagle.txt'
These are probably my fault. I'll fix that. Wichert.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/20/2013 09:48 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
[5] FAILED Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 178 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072600.html
Error: Picked: BTrees = 4.0.5
So now zope.annotation requires BTrees, which is not part of the ZTK.
Two options:
* pin zope.annotation to an older branch that didn't require BTrees * add BTrees and the other exploded-ZODB3-packages to the ZTK, switch ZODB3 from the 3.10 branch to trunk
Rather than the ZODB trunk, the ZTK trunk could pull in ZODB 4.0.0a4, which then depends on BTrees, persistent, etc. The alpha status of that release is an indication of more work to be done (porting to PyPy and Py3k, mostly). But the release itself should be usable for testing the ZTK. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlEk9HcACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7a3QCfVfzAcVXIO3iGlWSXVV/fyh0V sMcAoLHrquKlSOR/4nV0w/Ox+6Z+VGhC =+9nT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (4)
-
Marius Gedminas -
Tres Seaver -
Wichert Akkerman -
Zope tests summarizer