Zope Tests: 72 OK, 15 Failed
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Feb 16 12:00:00 2011 UTC to Thu Feb 17 12:00:00 2011 UTC. There were 87 messages: 8 from Zope Tests, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 31 from buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 11 from ccomb at free.fr, 33 from jdriessen at thehealthagency.com. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.1_win-py2.5 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:03:12 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032218.html Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit_win-py2.5 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:18:08 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032223.html Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit_win-py2.6 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:25:31 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032226.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 22:23:17 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032270.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.rml_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 22:55:16 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032271.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.template_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 23:04:00 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032272.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.layer.ready2go_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 23:09:06 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032273.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.formui_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 23:10:30 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032274.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.tabular_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 23:12:40 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032275.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 23:13:35 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032276.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.ptcompat_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 23:35:01 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032278.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.pdftemplate_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 23:39:05 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032279.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.coverage_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 23:40:28 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032280.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.macro_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 23:41:13 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032281.html Subject: FAILED : winbot / z3c.pagelet_py_265_32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 23:46:05 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032282.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.13_win-py2.6 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 14:15:13 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032206.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.13_win-py2.7 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 14:17:39 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032207.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.0_win-py2.4 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 14:31:28 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032208.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12-py2.6 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 14:43:30 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032209.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.0_win-py2.5 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 14:43:50 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032210.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.13-py2.6 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 14:44:55 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032211.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.13-py2.7 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 14:46:20 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032212.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.14-py2.6 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 14:47:45 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032213.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.14-py2.7 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 14:49:10 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032214.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.0-py2.4 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 14:54:54 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032215.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.0_win-py2.6 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 14:55:32 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032216.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.0-py2.5 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:00:57 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032217.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.0-py2.6 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:06:47 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032219.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.1_win-py2.6 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:10:35 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032220.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.1-py2.5 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:11:35 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032221.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.1-py2.6 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:16:28 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032222.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_dev py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 15:18:48 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032224.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-py2.5 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:21:21 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032225.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-py2.6 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:26:11 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032227.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 15:27:25 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032228.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 15:35:46 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032229.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 15:44:21 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032230.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 15:54:14 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032231.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_244_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 16:03:40 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032232.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 16:12:20 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032233.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 16:20:28 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032234.html Subject: OK : winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 16:28:39 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032235.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12-py2.6 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 16:29:49 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032236.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.13-py2.6 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 16:31:39 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032237.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.13-py2.7 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 16:33:18 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032238.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.14-py2.6 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 16:34:58 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032239.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.14-py2.7 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 16:36:40 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032240.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 16:40:41 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032241.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.0-py2.4 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 16:43:35 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032242.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.0-py2.5 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 16:50:51 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032243.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 16:53:16 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032244.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.0-py2.6 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 16:57:56 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032245.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.1-py2.5 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 17:03:34 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032246.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 17:06:00 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032247.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.1-py2.6 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 17:09:22 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032248.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-py2.5 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 17:14:58 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032249.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_270_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 17:19:02 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032250.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-py2.6 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 17:20:50 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032251.html Subject: OK : winbot / zc_buildout_dev py_270_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 17:31:43 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032252.html Subject: OK : winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 18:26:50 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032253.html Subject: OK : winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 19:22:11 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032254.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Wed Feb 16 19:46:53 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032255.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Wed Feb 16 19:47:17 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032256.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Wed Feb 16 19:47:30 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032257.html Subject: OK : winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 20:17:07 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032258.html Subject: OK : winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 21:12:12 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032259.html Subject: OK : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux From: buildbot at pov.lt Date: Wed Feb 16 21:15:07 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032260.html Subject: OK : Bluebream / Python2.4.6 64bit linux From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Wed Feb 16 22:07:10 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032261.html Subject: OK : Bluebream / Python2.6.5 64bit linux From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Wed Feb 16 22:07:14 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032262.html Subject: OK : Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Wed Feb 16 22:07:17 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032263.html Subject: OK : winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 From: buildbot at winbot.zope.org Date: Wed Feb 16 22:08:13 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032264.html Subject: OK : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux From: buildbot at pov.lt Date: Wed Feb 16 22:12:23 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032265.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Wed Feb 16 22:13:14 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032266.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Wed Feb 16 22:13:54 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032267.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Wed Feb 16 22:14:18 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032268.html Subject: OK : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux From: buildbot at pov.lt Date: Wed Feb 16 22:14:42 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032269.html Subject: OK : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux From: buildbot at pov.lt Date: Wed Feb 16 23:23:52 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032277.html Subject: OK : Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Thu Feb 17 00:24:14 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032283.html Subject: OK : Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Thu Feb 17 00:46:30 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032284.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 17 01:06:52 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032285.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 17 01:08:52 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032286.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 17 01:10:52 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032287.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 17 01:12:52 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032288.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 17 01:14:52 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032289.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 17 01:16:52 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032290.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 17 01:18:52 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032291.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Feb 17 01:20:52 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032292.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/17/2011 06:58 AM, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.1_win-py2.5 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:03:12 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032218.html
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit_win-py2.5 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:18:08 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032223.html
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit_win-py2.6 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:25:31 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032226.html
These three failures are due to a quirk in how datetime.datetime repr works: if the 'microseconds' field happens to be zero, it isn't printed, e.g.: Expected: datetime.datetime(<DATETIME>, tzinfo=<UTC>) Got: datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 16, 20, 0, 43, tzinfo=<UTC>) The regex (in zope.dublincore.tests.test_timeannotators), expects the microseconds value to be present: datetime_re = ( '[0-9]{4}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, \ [0-9]{1,2}, ' '[0-9]{1,6}') I have no idea why that value is suddenly exactly zero for the THA box. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1dRasACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4R6ACfTV1r4oXAPee23hIDnA5GEaqQ pX8AoJLVWCq35GWNDCxxqeDmyfezzg9U =Lnxh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi, I have tried this code on Python 2.7.1 (r271:86832, Nov 27 2010, 18:30:46) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32. It seems that it is possible to have no milliseconds returned by datetime.now.
while 1: ... datetime.now(pytz.utc) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 17, 984000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 17, 984000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) ... datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) ... datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, 15000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, 15000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, 15000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, 125000, tzinfo=<UTC>) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module> File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\pytz-2011b-py2.7.egg\pytz\__init__.py", li ne 186, in utcoffset KeyboardInterrupt
Simon On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2011 06:58 AM, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.1_win-py2.5 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:03:12 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032218.html
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit_win-py2.5 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:18:08 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032223.html
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit_win-py2.6 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:25:31 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032226.html
These three failures are due to a quirk in how datetime.datetime repr works: if the 'microseconds' field happens to be zero, it isn't printed, e.g.:
Expected: datetime.datetime(<DATETIME>, tzinfo=<UTC>) Got: datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 16, 20, 0, 43, tzinfo=<UTC>)
The regex (in zope.dublincore.tests.test_timeannotators), expects the microseconds value to be present:
datetime_re = ( '[0-9]{4}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, \ [0-9]{1,2}, ' '[0-9]{1,6}')
I have no idea why that value is suddenly exactly zero for the THA box.
Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk1dRasACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4R6ACfTV1r4oXAPee23hIDnA5GEaqQ pX8AoJLVWCq35GWNDCxxqeDmyfezzg9U =Lnxh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
On 18 February 2011 00:55, Simon Elbaz <elbazsimon9@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, I have tried this code on Python 2.7.1 (r271:86832, Nov 27 2010, 18:30:46) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32. It seems that it is possible to have no milliseconds returned by datetime.now.
while 1: ... datetime.now(pytz.utc) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 17, 984000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 17, 984000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) ... datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) ... datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, 15000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, 15000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, 15000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, 125000, tzinfo=<UTC>) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module> File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\pytz-2011b-py2.7.egg\pytz\__init__.py", li ne 186, in utcoffset KeyboardInterrupt
Simon
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2011 06:58 AM, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.1_win-py2.5 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:03:12 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032218.html
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit_win-py2.5 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:18:08 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032223.html
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit_win-py2.6 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:25:31 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032226.html
These three failures are due to a quirk in how datetime.datetime repr works: if the 'microseconds' field happens to be zero, it isn't printed, e.g.:
Expected: datetime.datetime(<DATETIME>, tzinfo=<UTC>) Got: datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 16, 20, 0, 43, tzinfo=<UTC>)
The regex (in zope.dublincore.tests.test_timeannotators), expects the microseconds value to be present:
datetime_re = ( '[0-9]{4}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, \ [0-9]{1,2}, ' '[0-9]{1,6}')
I have no idea why that value is suddenly exactly zero for the THA box.
Tres.
Simon, Thank you for looking into this. I am kind of happy that the error can be reproduced on a different windows machine. Tres, It is indeed 'special' that this error occurs only now. The windows builds for zope.dublincore trunk have not shown this error: http://dev.thehealthagency.com/buildbot/builders/zope.dublincore_3%20slave-w... http://dev.thehealthagency.com/buildbot/builders/zope.dublincore_5%20slave-w... http://dev.thehealthagency.com/buildbot/builders/zope.dublincore_trunk%20sla... How to proceed? Make the regex in zope.dublincore.tests.test_timeannotators less strict? I am not a pypi owner of zope.dublincore, so Tres, could you do the honors? Jan-Jaap
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:21:12AM +0100, Jan-Jaap Driessen wrote:
Thank you for looking into this. I am kind of happy that the error can be reproduced on a different windows machine.
Tres,
It is indeed 'special' that this error occurs only now. The windows builds for zope.dublincore trunk have not shown this error:
http://dev.thehealthagency.com/buildbot/builders/zope.dublincore_3%20slave-w... http://dev.thehealthagency.com/buildbot/builders/zope.dublincore_5%20slave-w... http://dev.thehealthagency.com/buildbot/builders/zope.dublincore_trunk%20sla...
How to proceed? Make the regex in zope.dublincore.tests.test_timeannotators less strict?
That sounds like the right solution to me.
I am not a pypi owner of zope.dublincore,
I am. Would you like to be too? Marius Gedminas -- http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development
Hi Marius, On 18 February 2011 17:34, Marius Gedminas <marius@gedmin.as> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:21:12AM +0100, Jan-Jaap Driessen wrote:
Thank you for looking into this. I am kind of happy that the error can be reproduced on a different windows machine.
Tres,
It is indeed 'special' that this error occurs only now. The windows builds for zope.dublincore trunk have not shown this error:
http://dev.thehealthagency.com/buildbot/builders/zope.dublincore_3%20slave-w... http://dev.thehealthagency.com/buildbot/builders/zope.dublincore_5%20slave-w... http://dev.thehealthagency.com/buildbot/builders/zope.dublincore_trunk%20sla...
How to proceed? Make the regex in zope.dublincore.tests.test_timeannotators less strict?
That sounds like the right solution to me.
I am not a pypi owner of zope.dublincore,
I am. Would you like to be too?
Marius Gedminas
Thanks for looking into this. I was away from my computer for a while and couldn't get back to you before. I see that Tres fixed zope.dublincore in the mean time. Cheers, -- Jan-Jaap Driessen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/18/2011 03:21 AM, Jan-Jaap Driessen wrote:
On 18 February 2011 00:55, Simon Elbaz <elbazsimon9@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, I have tried this code on Python 2.7.1 (r271:86832, Nov 27 2010, 18:30:46) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32. It seems that it is possible to have no milliseconds returned by datetime.now.
while 1: ... datetime.now(pytz.utc) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 17, 984000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 17, 984000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) ... datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, tzinfo=<UTC>) ... datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, 15000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, 15000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, 15000, tzinfo=<UTC>) datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 17, 23, 48, 18, 125000, tzinfo=<UTC>) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module> File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\pytz-2011b-py2.7.egg\pytz\__init__.py", li ne 186, in utcoffset KeyboardInterrupt
Simon
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2011 06:58 AM, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.1_win-py2.5 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:03:12 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032218.html
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit_win-py2.5 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:18:08 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032223.html
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit_win-py2.6 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:25:31 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032226.html
These three failures are due to a quirk in how datetime.datetime repr works: if the 'microseconds' field happens to be zero, it isn't printed, e.g.:
Expected: datetime.datetime(<DATETIME>, tzinfo=<UTC>) Got: datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 16, 20, 0, 43, tzinfo=<UTC>)
The regex (in zope.dublincore.tests.test_timeannotators), expects the microseconds value to be present:
datetime_re = ( '[0-9]{4}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, \ [0-9]{1,2}, ' '[0-9]{1,6}')
I have no idea why that value is suddenly exactly zero for the THA box.
Tres.
Simon,
Thank you for looking into this. I am kind of happy that the error can be reproduced on a different windows machine.
Tres,
It is indeed 'special' that this error occurs only now. The windows builds for zope.dublincore trunk have not shown this error:
http://dev.thehealthagency.com/buildbot/builders/zope.dublincore_3%20slave-w... http://dev.thehealthagency.com/buildbot/builders/zope.dublincore_5%20slave-w... http://dev.thehealthagency.com/buildbot/builders/zope.dublincore_trunk%20sla...
How to proceed? Make the regex in zope.dublincore.tests.test_timeannotators less strict?
I am not a pypi owner of zope.dublincore, so Tres, could you do the honors?
I made a stab at fixing the regex. If the "dev" checkouts start passing, then we can do a release. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1e6PsACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4ovgCeKYvKv+DfKGtkBB4aTiaXbBe4 Ec0AoMDWuEXSZ9ZwzQJrQH5gMQtemC5n =1xra -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/18/2011 04:47 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
zope.dublincore.tests.test_timeannotators less strict?
I am not a pypi owner of zope.dublincore, so Tres, could you do the honors?
I made a stab at fixing the regex. If the "dev" checkouts start passing, then we can do a release.
I tagged a 3.8.2 release and pushed it to PyPI. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1fzSUACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ6kXACgpN57yImuKB0JOs8or9aKoR7Z 0GYAoJxAy792QR0vRNnSvhKbEgsQU5a9 =HU1i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hello, On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:58:35 -0500 you wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2011 06:58 AM, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.1_win-py2.5 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:03:12 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032218.html
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit_win-py2.5 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:18:08 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032223.html
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit_win-py2.6 slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Wed Feb 16 15:25:31 EST 2011 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-February/032226.html
These three failures are due to a quirk in how datetime.datetime repr works: if the 'microseconds' field happens to be zero, it isn't printed, e.g.:
Expected: datetime.datetime(<DATETIME>, tzinfo=<UTC>) Got: datetime.datetime(2011, 2, 16, 20, 0, 43, tzinfo=<UTC>)
The regex (in zope.dublincore.tests.test_timeannotators), expects the microseconds value to be present:
datetime_re = ( '[0-9]{4}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, [0-9]{1,2}, \ [0-9]{1,2}, ' '[0-9]{1,6}')
I have no idea why that value is suddenly exactly zero for the THA box.
Windowze... We also have such a failure 1 in 50 buildbot runs. Tho very misterious how it could happen 3x in a row. -- Best regards, Adam GROSZER -- Quote of the day: Faith on a full stomach may be simply contentment- but if you have it when you're hungry, it's genuine. - Frank A. Clark
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39, Adam GROSZER <agroszer.ll@gmail.com> wrote:
Windowze... We also have such a failure 1 in 50 buildbot runs. Tho very misterious how it could happen 3x in a row.
If the failure is random, with a chance of 1 in 50, 3 times in a row is no mystery. It shows the failure is truly random! :-) -- Martijn Pieters
participants (7)
-
Adam GROSZER -
Jan-Jaap Driessen -
Marius Gedminas -
Martijn Pieters -
Simon Elbaz -
Tres Seaver -
Zope Tests Summarizer