zope-tests - FAILED: 8, OK: 31
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-11-01 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-11-02 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux [1] ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [2] ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit [3] ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [4] ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit [5] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit [6] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit [7] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [8] winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052076.html [2] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052075.html [3] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052074.html [4] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052073.html [5] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052088.html [6] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052089.html [7] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052087.html [8] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052080.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
[1] FAILED ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052076.html
This
issue should be fixed by yesterday's release of zope.testing 3.9.7.
[2] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052075.html
[3] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052074.html
[4] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052073.html
[5] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052088.html
[6] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052089.html
[7] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052087.html
[2]
- - [7] are all the "unexpected Data.fs" bug in zope/testing/setupstack.txt. Can somebody who cares about that module / feature figure out what is going on?
[8] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052080.html
Same
as yesterday (and the day before, and the day before). Is nobody maintaining this package? Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6yFKgACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7NGQCgzwxcT6o5W5Bb2cl/dZDxGjU2 wiwAoMYZJenWEdn0aNdTUXwaZKZjgVAZ =cpvb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Am 03.11.2011 um 05:12 schrieb Tres Seaver: [...]
[8] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052080.html
Same as yesterday (and the day before, and the day before). Is nobody maintaining this package?
Roger worked on this package recently. Roger, can you reproduce this failure and fix it? (On Mac OS X I see the same failure.) Yours sincerely, -- Michael Howitz · mh@gocept.com · software developer gocept gmbh & co. kg · Forsterstraße 29 · 06112 Halle (Saale) · Germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 8 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development
Am 03.11.2011 um 05:12 schrieb Tres Seaver: [...]
[7] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052087.html
- - [7] are all the "unexpected Data.fs" bug in zope/testing/setupstack.txt. Can somebody who cares about that module / feature figure out what is going on?
I looked into this failure: - It only happens if the zope.testrunner tests are ran before zope.testing tests (on my laptop z3c.recipe.compattest sorts the tests differently by default.) Strangely I found no references of the string "Data.fs" in zope.testrunner maybe it changes the current working directory and another test puts the Data.fs there. - zope/testing/setupstack.txt creates a file named Data.fs in a temporary directory, it asserts that is has been gone after stack tear down, but the assertion uses the wrong directory (cwd). - I fixed this test and released zope.testing 3.10.3. So this failure should be gone tomorrow. Yours sincerely, -- Michael Howitz · mh@gocept.com · software developer gocept gmbh & co. kg · Forsterstraße 29 · 06112 Halle (Saale) · Germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 8 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/03/2011 04:57 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
Am 03.11.2011 um 05:12 schrieb Tres Seaver: [...]
[7] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/052087.html
- - [7] are all the "unexpected Data.fs" bug in zope/testing/setupstack.txt. Can somebody who cares about that module / feature figure out what is going on?
I looked into this failure:
- It only happens if the zope.testrunner tests are ran before zope.testing tests (on my laptop z3c.recipe.compattest sorts the tests differently by default.) Strangely I found no references of the string "Data.fs" in zope.testrunner maybe it changes the current working directory and another test puts the Data.fs there. - zope/testing/setupstack.txt creates a file named Data.fs in a temporary directory, it asserts that is has been gone after stack tear down, but the assertion uses the wrong directory (cwd). - I fixed this test and released zope.testing 3.10.3. So this failure should be gone tomorrow.
Great, thank you very much! Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6zAbcACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ6owgCg11IcZr+DYyzqA/LQ2uAlquLj Es4AoNsdcNqNzV2aSX+lNeW4yttir8jD =xe4r -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (3)
-
Michael Howitz -
Tres Seaver -
Zope tests summarizer