Helping Digital Creations fix bugs - suggestions
I just answered a question on the Zope list about a bug in Gadfly which doesn't allow linebreaks. I was at least the second person to encounter this bug - I got the answer from someone else. The solution is to delete 1(!) character. I submitted it to the Collector, and now it says: Submitted: 2000/01/11 * * * This item is under review * * * okay, there was a conference, and it's not so big a bug, but I get the feeling nobody ever read the bug report, since fixing it takes 30 seconds at the most. I doubt it'll be fixed until someone from DC find the bug independently. I know DC asked about this at the conference, but I think people who weren't there might think of something too. Some uggested solutions (from what DC promised/suggested or): 1. Hand out portions of Zope to outside people (stuff like load_site.py or StructuredText comes to mind). I'd volunteer for load_site (proof of competence will be presented once I check that my merge with CVS actually works :). and/or Setup a (moderated?) mailing-list for each component devoted only to that specific component and force ZComponent's maintainer to read it. I'm thinking zope-zcatalog and zope-sql and zope-zpublisher, modeled after the mozilla and ptk lists. How many patches sent to zope-dev or zope lists got lost in the all the noise? 2. Change Collector so it has categories for stuff like Gadfly, StructuredText - for every Zope component. Remove obsolete stuff like ZTables. If I file a Gadfly bug, it should be emailed to the ZGadflyDA maintainer. Switch to Roundabout (http://www.lfw.org/python) when it's released? Anybody else have suggestions? -- Itamar S.T. itamars@ibm.net
participants (1)
-
Itamar Shtull-Trauring