Hi all, I had some questions about SkinScripts: 1) Are there any naming conventions for SkinScripts? 2) Is there any reason (other than factoring) to split SkinScripts up, or is putting all your declarations in one SkinScript ok? Thanks, Michael Bernstein.
Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
Hi all,
I had some questions about SkinScripts:
1) Are there any naming conventions for SkinScripts?
I have used the names "attributes" "domain_catalog" and "site_index" quite often. I use "attributes" for computed attrubutes, "domain_catalog" to trigger cataloging in a ZCatalog within the Specialist, and "site_index" for cataloging in an acquired ZCatalog common to the entire application. I typically use the SiteIndex for text searches across many types of content. I also often call a Class Extender "instance_methods". On other applications, I've split the SkinScript according to whether it provides attributes for the object computed from its own real attributes, or whether it provides attributes and triggers that link the object to other objects and take care of referential integrity.
2) Is there any reason (other than factoring) to split SkinScripts up, or is putting all your declarations in one SkinScript ok?
Each SkinScript statement gets compiled into a separate provider/trigger/agent/whatever, so it doesn't make any difference to how fast the SkinScript executes. You do need to split your SkinScript up according to what proxy roles they need. There's another related issue of what attributes to compute in a single SkinScript statement, but that's pretty much covered in the documentation. I looked into this quite deeply when I found I needed the "INVALIDATE FOR" syntax. -- Steve Alexander Software Engineer Cat-Box limited
At 10:59 PM 4/1/01 -0700, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
1) Are there any naming conventions for SkinScripts?
Not that I'm aware of. I think Ty names all of his methods "SkinScript", but then, he tends to name all his working/temporary files "x", so what does he know? ;)
2) Is there any reason (other than factoring) to split SkinScripts up, or is putting all your declarations in one SkinScript ok?
The compiler creates a seperate attribute provider or agent for each declaration anyway, so there's no reason not to put them all in one if you don't need to interleave non-SkinScript providers/agents into the priority order.
participants (3)
-
Michael R. Bernstein -
Phillip J. Eby -
Steve Alexander