Zope Tests: 42 OK, 3 Failed
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Jun 27 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Jun 28 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 45 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 11 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from ct at gocept.com, 27 from jdriessen at thehealthagency.com. Test failures ------------- Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-osx From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 13:01:37 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015850.html Subject: FAILED: Repository policy check found errors in 420 projects From: ct at gocept.com Date: Sun Jun 27 21:12:38 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015852.html Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / ztk_win slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Mon Jun 28 07:35:47 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015874.html Tests passed OK --------------- Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 08:54:39 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015834.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 08:54:44 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015835.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-osx From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 09:20:10 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015836.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-osx From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 09:27:18 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015837.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 09:54:38 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015838.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 09:54:44 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015839.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / ztk slave-osx From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 09:58:19 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015840.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / ztk slave-osx From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 10:29:31 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015841.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-osx From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 10:36:34 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015842.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 10:54:41 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015843.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 10:54:47 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015844.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-osx From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 10:59:46 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015845.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 12:55:09 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015846.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 12:55:16 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015847.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 12:56:59 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015848.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 12:57:10 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015849.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-osx From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 13:08:47 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015851.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Jun 27 21:31:00 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015853.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Jun 27 21:33:00 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015854.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Jun 27 21:35:00 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015855.html Subject: OK : Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Jun 27 21:37:00 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015856.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Jun 27 21:39:00 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015857.html Subject: OK : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Jun 27 21:41:00 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015858.html Subject: OK : BlueBream template / Python2.4.6 32bit linux From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Sun Jun 27 22:00:57 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015860.html Subject: OK : BlueBream template / Python2.5.2 32bit linux From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Sun Jun 27 22:00:59 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015859.html Subject: OK : BlueBream template / Python2.6.4 32bit linux From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Sun Jun 27 22:00:59 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015861.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 32bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Mon Jun 28 00:14:46 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015862.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.2 Linux 32bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Mon Jun 28 00:16:58 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015863.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.4 Linux 32bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Mon Jun 28 00:17:39 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015864.html Subject: OK : Zope 3.4.1 KGS / Python2.4.6 32bit linux From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Mon Jun 28 00:35:48 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015865.html Subject: OK : Zope 3.4.1 KGS / Python2.5.2 32bit linux From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Mon Jun 28 00:59:00 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015866.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 32bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Mon Jun 28 01:50:13 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015867.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.4 Linux 32bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Mon Jun 28 01:51:43 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015868.html Subject: OK : ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.2 Linux 32bit From: ccomb at free.fr Date: Mon Jun 28 01:51:49 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015869.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Mon Jun 28 07:29:42 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015870.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Mon Jun 28 07:32:19 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015871.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Mon Jun 28 07:33:30 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015872.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Mon Jun 28 07:35:41 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015873.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / ztk slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Mon Jun 28 07:37:30 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015875.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / ztk slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Mon Jun 28 07:42:46 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015876.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu64 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Mon Jun 28 07:55:31 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015877.html Subject: OK : Zope Buildbot / zope2 slave-ubuntu32 From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Mon Jun 28 07:55:42 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015878.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Jun 27 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Jun 28 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 45 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 11 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from ct at gocept.com, 27 from jdriessen at thehealthagency.com.
Test failures -------------
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-osx From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 13:01:37 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015850.html
The failing test here looks completely absurd: - ------------------------------- %< ----------------------------------- Failure in test /Users/buildslave/.buildout/eggs/zope.testbrowser-3.6.0a2-py2.6.egg/zope/testbrowser/README.txt Failed doctest test for README.txt File "/Users/buildslave/.buildout/eggs/zope.testbrowser-3.6.0a2-py2.6.egg/zope/testbrowser/README.txt", line 0 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- File "/Users/buildslave/.buildout/eggs/zope.testbrowser-3.6.0a2-py2.6.egg/zope/testbrowser/README.txt", line 1248, in README.txt Failed example: browser.lastRequestPystones < 10000 # really big number for safety Expected: True Got: False - ------------------------------- %< ----------------------------------- What in the name of all that is holy is that supposed to be testing (much lest documenting)? In other words: who wants to argue for not ripping that useless (so I assert ;) assertion out?
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / ztk_win slave-win From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Mon Jun 28 07:35:47 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015874.html
This is still the can't-remove-an-opened-file thing, right? Somebody who does Windows development is going to have to fix this one. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkwqRvAACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7Z2gCgsY545DY/2eHUnDkRVtgSnX40 iiMAnRAxAQdUYfJ9eCdWY0y7EGJhhm4t =eNnC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Jun 27 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Jun 28 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 45 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 11 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from ct at gocept.com, 27 from jdriessen at thehealthagency.com.
Test failures -------------
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-osx From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 13:01:37 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015850.html
The failing test here looks completely absurd:
- ------------------------------- %< ----------------------------------- Failure in test /Users/buildslave/.buildout/eggs/zope.testbrowser-3.6.0a2-py2.6.egg/zope/testbrowser/README.txt Failed doctest test for README.txt File "/Users/buildslave/.buildout/eggs/zope.testbrowser-3.6.0a2-py2.6.egg/zope/testbrowser/README.txt", line 0
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- File "/Users/buildslave/.buildout/eggs/zope.testbrowser-3.6.0a2-py2.6.egg/zope/testbrowser/README.txt", line 1248, in README.txt Failed example: browser.lastRequestPystones < 10000 # really big number for safety Expected: True Got: False
- ------------------------------- %< -----------------------------------
What in the name of all that is holy is that supposed to be testing (much lest documenting)? In other words: who wants to argue for not ripping that useless (so I assert ;) assertion out?
The above is attempting to document the fact that the lastRequestPystones exists and is a number. If I were to write the test today I'd use a mocking framework to fix the number returned so the example is more direct, but it seems sufficient as-is. -- Benji York
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Benji York wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Jun 27 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Jun 28 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 45 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 11 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from ct at gocept.com, 27 from jdriessen at thehealthagency.com.
Test failures -------------
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-osx From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com Date: Sun Jun 27 13:01:37 EDT 2010 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-June/015850.html The failing test here looks completely absurd:
- ------------------------------- %< ----------------------------------- Failure in test /Users/buildslave/.buildout/eggs/zope.testbrowser-3.6.0a2-py2.6.egg/zope/testbrowser/README.txt Failed doctest test for README.txt File "/Users/buildslave/.buildout/eggs/zope.testbrowser-3.6.0a2-py2.6.egg/zope/testbrowser/README.txt", line 0
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- File "/Users/buildslave/.buildout/eggs/zope.testbrowser-3.6.0a2-py2.6.egg/zope/testbrowser/README.txt", line 1248, in README.txt Failed example: browser.lastRequestPystones < 10000 # really big number for safety Expected: True Got: False
- ------------------------------- %< -----------------------------------
What in the name of all that is holy is that supposed to be testing (much lest documenting)? In other words: who wants to argue for not ripping that useless (so I assert ;) assertion out?
The above is attempting to document the fact that the lastRequestPystones exists and is a number. If I were to write the test today I'd use a mocking framework to fix the number returned so the example is more direct, but it seems sufficient as-is.
The fact that the test failed seems to make it less than sufficient. I don't quite see how checking pystones is a useful measure, unless you *know* that there is only CPU involved and that the machine where you are checking it is effectively unloaded: I/O and scheduling latencies aren't going to be magically subtracted. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkwstZ4ACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ46cwCfVv1kW9puKD42/4LA9A6fIl+9 GloAoL0aniwfERm8KLKecHuhtGt8Bb98 =ER8F -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
The fact that the test failed seems to make it less than sufficient. I don't quite see how checking pystones is a useful measure, unless you *know* that there is only CPU involved and that the machine where you are checking it is effectively unloaded: I/O and scheduling latencies aren't going to be magically subtracted.
Is this a complaint about the test/documentation or the feature? If the test/documentation, I've already stated what should be done about it -- and I may do so at some point in the near future. In the meantime, adding another zero or five would decrease the chance of it failing again. If the feature: it's certainly not perfect, but has been useful. -- Benji York
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Benji York wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
The fact that the test failed seems to make it less than sufficient. I don't quite see how checking pystones is a useful measure, unless you *know* that there is only CPU involved and that the machine where you are checking it is effectively unloaded: I/O and scheduling latencies aren't going to be magically subtracted.
Is this a complaint about the test/documentation or the feature?
Primarily about the test failure, and therefore the way the test is written.
If the test/documentation, I've already stated what should be done about it -- and I may do so at some point in the near future. In the meantime, adding another zero or five would decrease the chance of it failing again.
That wouldn't make the assertion any more useful either as a test (if testing that the attribute is present and is an integer is all that is wanted, then why not 'isinstance(browser.lastRequestPystones, int)'?) or as documentation: what does 10,000 pystones mean? or 100,000?
If the feature: it's certainly not perfect, but has been useful.
If the feature itself is valuable, then its documentation should give the user some idea how to interpret the value. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkws1usACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7vmgCg0xuhiTTcxAWNjpRRUC2nT8CT yKsAn1TO7lGq+m0CwTdtbFXR2MmQVews =G15D -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (3)
-
Benji York -
Tres Seaver -
Zope Tests Summarizer