This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-10-24 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-10-25 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received ---------------- Bluebream / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.6.5 64bit linux Bluebream / Python2.7.2 64bit linux ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit [1] ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit [2] ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit [3] ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit [4] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit [5] ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64 [6] winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64 [7] winbot / ztk_dev py_254_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32 winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64 Non-OK results -------------- [1] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051688.html [2] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051687.html [3] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051686.html [4] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051703.html [5] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051701.html [6] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051704.html [7] FAILED winbot / ztk_dev py_254_win32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051719.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Woohoo -- down to just seven!
[1] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051688.html
This
has the "sub-process buffer" failure for which I checked in a fix today from Jonathan Ballet: I'm hopeful that it clears up tomorrow. This run also has the "unexpected Data.fs in a tempdir" failure.
[2] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051687.html
This
run has the same two failures, plus the command-line error for the 'cProfile' option. Christophe, can you please verify that the Python 2.6.5 used to run these tests was built from source, and has the 'cProfile.py' module? I suspect we may be using a "system Python" on an OS which splits out the devtools into a separate OS-level distribution (e.g., 'python-dev' or some such).
[3] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051686.html
This
run has only the "unexpected Data.fs" failure.
[4] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051703.html
Same
failures as #1.
[5] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051701.html
Same
failures as #2.
[6] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051704.html
I'm
ignoring this one, except to note that it is *not* lxml related.
[7] FAILED winbot / ztk_dev py_254_win32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051719.html
This
build should be disabled: the ZTK trunk is no longer compatible with Python 2.5. So, in summary, we can get back to a "green board" if we can figure out the three distinct errors here: - - A 'Data.fs' present in what is supposed to be a newly-created tempdir, in zope.testrunner/src/zope/testrunner/testrunner-subunit.txt. - - The "subprocess buffer" failure I hope I fixed today. - - THe 'cProfile' issue, only on ccomb's Python 2.6.5. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6naScACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ51EwCeIpofX9MxjDUJhzNTWg4YGA4l WCQAoJabPy9M7l4TQOL14mE35Oj1HI3C =c3wo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
[6] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051704.html
I'm ignoring this one, except to note that it is *not* lxml related.
This was a version conflict for some Chameleon libraries, as a result of half-pinning. I pinned all Chameleon versions and the build worked locally for me. Maybe it'll work soon on the winbot.
[7] FAILED winbot / ztk_dev py_254_win32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051719.html
This build should be disabled: the ZTK trunk is no longer compatible with Python 2.5.
I removed it. Hanno
Le 26/10/2011 03:57, Tres Seaver a écrit :
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Woohoo -- down to just seven!
[1] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051688.html
This
has the "sub-process buffer" failure for which I checked in a fix today from Jonathan Ballet: I'm hopeful that it clears up tomorrow.
This run also has the "unexpected Data.fs in a tempdir" failure.
[2] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051687.html
This
run has the same two failures, plus the command-line error for the 'cProfile' option. Christophe, can you please verify that the Python 2.6.5 used to run these tests was built from source, and has the 'cProfile.py' module? I suspect we may be using a "system Python" on an OS which splits out the devtools into a separate OS-level distribution (e.g., 'python-dev' or some such).
It's a system python 2.6.5 indeed, I'm replacing it with a new build of 2.6.7 Christophe
[3] FAILED ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051686.html
This
run has only the "unexpected Data.fs" failure.
[4] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051703.html
Same
failures as #1.
[5] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051701.html
Same
failures as #2.
[6] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051704.html
I'm
ignoring this one, except to note that it is *not* lxml related.
[7] FAILED winbot / ztk_dev py_254_win32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051719.html
This
build should be disabled: the ZTK trunk is no longer compatible with Python 2.5.
So, in summary, we can get back to a "green board" if we can figure out the three distinct errors here:
- - A 'Data.fs' present in what is supposed to be a newly-created tempdir, in zope.testrunner/src/zope/testrunner/testrunner-subunit.txt.
- - The "subprocess buffer" failure I hope I fixed today.
- - THe 'cProfile' issue, only on ccomb's Python 2.6.5.
Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk6naScACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ51EwCeIpofX9MxjDUJhzNTWg4YGA4l WCQAoJabPy9M7l4TQOL14mE35Oj1HI3C =c3wo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/26/2011 06:54 AM, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Le 26/10/2011 03:57, Tres Seaver a écrit :
This run has the same two failures, plus the command-line error for the 'cProfile' option. Christophe, can you please verify that the Python 2.6.5 used to run these tests was built from source, and has the 'cProfile.py' module? I suspect we may be using a "system Python" on an OS which splits out the devtools into a separate OS-level distribution (e.g., 'python-dev' or some such).
It's a system python 2.6.5 indeed, I'm replacing it with a new build of 2.6.7
Great! that should leave use with only the "unexpected Data.fs-in-tempdir" failure to diagnose. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6oDf4ACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4XEQCfU/AAQtbv2zdS7NTNrU+NSS7a JxAAn2DDLzvH3gz8pvIsDsr9+/gqgCSG =dz9V -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (4)
-
Christophe Combelles -
Hanno Schlichting -
Tres Seaver -
Zope tests summarizer