forking of the mailing list
There was a discussion on zope@zope.org about forking of the mailing list. Would there be any support behind a seperate ZPatterns list? There seem to be lots of users and lots of questions that arent of interest to people who dont use ZPatterns (like me). Cheers. -- Andy McKay.
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:15:01 -0700, "Andy McKay" <andym@ActiveState.com> wrote:
There was a discussion on zope@zope.org about forking of the mailing list. Would there be any support behind a seperate ZPatterns list? There seem to be lots of users and lots of questions that arent of interest to people who dont use ZPatterns (like me).
I dont use ZPatterns, and regularly ignore whole ZPattern-related threads. However I value the fact that an occasional a subject line catches my eye, and I have a chance to learn something new. I might not be using ZPatterns today, but that doesnt mean that it is wholly irrelevant to me. This morning (for me) zope-dev had 87 new messages in 29 threads. Do people really find this to be too many? Toby Dickenson tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com
There was a discussion on zope@zope.org about forking of the mailing list. Would there be any support behind a seperate ZPatterns list? There seem to be lots of users and lots of questions that arent of interest to people who dont use ZPatterns (like me).
This morning (for me) zope-dev had 87 new messages in 29 threads. Do people really find this to be too many?
Nope zope-dev is my favourite list for its low traffic and great posters. Just a suggestion that came up when the forking question came up on the zope list. Im happy the way it is... Cheers. -- Andy McKay.
participants (2)
-
Andy McKay -
Toby Dickenson