2009/4/27 Tres Seaver
<tseaver@palladion.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Garito wrote:
> jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
>
> Amazing!
>
> I don't know how the other list doesn't collapse using reply-to field
> jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
I said "religious" because I meant that people have strong opinions
about which style they prefer, and are not going to change them because
others argue for the other style. I didn't say (or imply) that those
who disagree with me are wrong / evil / stupid. I *did* say that this
list is run according to the "no-munging" rules, and that it was a
deliberate choice, not subject to debate.
Making joke, man, that's the point about religious, isn't it?
> What wonders me more is how belligerent some in this list are with this
> question
I don't see how my reply can be considered belligerent. Patrick asked
"why doesn't the list munge 'Reply-To'?", and I replied with a link to
an explanation, along with a statement that arguing the question would
not be fruitful.
I mix other conversations with that
> You cause the problem,
If you had actually read the link I sent, you would have learned about
the problems caused by munging 'Reply-To'. I have participated in
*lots* of mailing lists since the early nineties: those which do munge
the header are more painful, and routinely have "oops, that was supposed
to be a private reply" messages show up. The damage from such messages
is *much* higher than the occasional "forget to CC the list" stuff on
non-munging lists. Again, this is *opinion,* shared by lots of mailing
list maangers / users, but certainly not by all.
> at least try to don't threaten us with ban us if we
> send you private messages by mistake
I don't know what you are talking about here: I didn't threaten to ban
anybody. I generally ask (politely) that people keep their replies
on-list, and assume that the occasional off-list reply is an honest
mistake. I *have* set up filters (in my own mail processing) dropping
messages from a couple of users who persist in sending me private mail
after being asked to keep the traffic on the list.
There are people that response very rude to a mistake private message
> This kind of things are to don't take you seriously, sorry, but this cause a
> very bad impression of the people of this list
I'm sorry you feel that way.
I respect the opinions, yes, nothing to say about that. I respect you, all of you, sometimes the email is not a good way to express. I'm a little bit critic with some of the decisions you make because I think that Zope is the best operating system (yes, I said operating system) someone could need
I think I need to be as critic because when you decide to make a step far the vision of Zope I see more work I need to do for myself
I see Zope as a very very smart idea, a univers for my data in a very similar way as a human brain seems to work and when I see how you invest your time in another direction I sufer a lot
But, yes, I know that perhaps my vision of Zope is not like yours but it was, at least when I know Zope the people publish some products with the same vision
In that point I want to apologize. If I never offend you: sorry, nothing personal
iD8DBQFJ9cVx+gerLs4ltQ4RAoCdAJ9xOVCuNjNoxf5uMgTeaSQhiaXMNwCgpnvR
GHTZGcy1s0hP1/HRJPxX5xE=
=shhQ