jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
Amazing!
I don't know how the other list doesn't collapse using reply-to field
jajajajajajajajajajajajaja
What wonders me more is how belligerent some in this list are with this question
You cause the problem, at least try to don't threaten us with ban us if we send you private messages by mistake
This kind of things are to don't take you seriously, sorry, but this cause a very bad impression of the people of this list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Gerken wrote:That would be a "religious" question, and one which is not helpful to
> Argl, why does this mailing list not use the reply-to: field?
debate here.. E.g., see:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
The Zope mailing lists are *all* organized that way, because the admins
/ long-time users (including myself) are adherents of the "munging
considered harmful" denomination.
Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJ9J3E+gerLs4ltQ4RAnIyAKDAsEHOn49A4rY7S5GZ84NCbypytACfdNGr
yXP1QjIwUofepjFrwccbwjU=
=eapg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )