Lumír Jasiok wrote:
David Bear wrote:
What do you gain by doing this?
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Lumir Jasiok <lumir.jasiok@vsb.cz
<mailto:lumir.jasiok@vsb.cz>> wrote:
Hi,
I need to write an application which will be based on MVC design and
will have both web interface and desktop GUI based on wxPython. It is
possible to write such an application as standard Zope app and use
zope.interfaces package for defining wxPython GUI as other view
(I hope
that it's called view, I am not sure - I am new in Zope
programming)? Or
am I totally wrong?
Best Regards
Lumir Jasiok
--
Lumír Jasiok
VSB-TU Ostrava - Computer centre
Tel: +420 59 732 3189
E-mail: lumir.jasiok@vsb.cz <mailto:lumir.jasiok@vsb.cz>
http://www.vsb.cz
I want to have an application with common code for both web and
desktop application, so data and business logic will be common and
only thing which will be different will be a view (web page or desktop
application GUI). So users will have choice what interface they want
to use, data will be same.
As programmer I want to have common code for business logic, because
of simplicity. I don't want to have two trunks, two business logics etc.
Hi, Lumir
You might take a look at pyjamas (http://pyjs.org). Using pyjamas, you
can have common code for business logic and also for the GUI on web and
desktop. The main data transfer/persistence mechanism in pyjamas is
JSON-RPC, so that part of the model can be zope or anything that can do
JSON-RPC.
If you like wxPython GUI code, pyjamas code is very similar, and there
are examples using PureMVC (http://puremvc.org) in the repository.
You cannot, at present, use zope.interface to do automatic widget
generation in pyjamas. On the other hand, it is really easy to do custom
widgets and client-side display logic. You write your widgets and their
behavior in python, not in HTML and javascript. Styling, however, can
be done with css.
In the eight months since I first experimented with pyjamas
(http://www.mail-archive.com/zope@zope.org/msg31618.html), it has
improved substantially. Fewer gotchas. More joy. Worth a look.
- Jim Washington
Hi Jim,