[BlueBream] Attribute Annotation

Justin Ryan justin.ryan at reliefgarden.org
Thu Jun 17 21:09:15 EDT 2010


FWIW, when I put the lat/long schema fields onto IGeoLocation, and
changed all adaptions from IGeoCodedLocation to IGeoLocation, which of
course the object already implemented, everything worked.

There are some details in here where, I set the form up with two
schemas, but the IGeoLocation adaption was just the original object.

If what I'm doing is crazy, I'd appreciate any input, and be happy to
help impart that wisdom into the BB docs.

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Justin Ryan
<justin.ryan at reliefgarden.org> wrote:
> Howdy!
>
> I'm trying to use an Attribute Annotation Adapter to store Geo
> Location info on some content types.  Roughly, I've been following the
> doctest at:
>
>  http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.annotation
>
> I am happy to provide example code, what I have is a bit frazzled at
> the moment because I upgraded my mac to snow leopard the other day and
> apparently failed to commit the last set of changes to my project.
> Whups.
>
> Basically, here's the thing.
>
> I have a couple interfaces:
>
> class  IGeoLocation(Interface):
>  address = TextLine(title=u"Address")
>
> class IGeoCodedLocation(Interface)
>  latitude = Float(title=u"Latitude")
>  longitude = Float(title=u"Longitude")
>
> I have an annotation adapter, as best I could manage:
>
> class GeoCodedLocation(object):
>  implements(IGeoCodedLocation)
>  adapts(IGeoLocation)
>
>  def __init__(self, context):
>    self.longitude = 0.0
>    self.latitude = 0.0
>
> I have an event subscriber for (IObjectModified, IGeoLocation) which
> is able to successfully adapt my original content type implement
> IGeoLocation to an IGeoCodedLocation, hit the Google Geocoding API,
> and log the geocoded lat and long.  I am able to log the lat and log
> values from the adapted IGeoCodedLocation object.
>
> But, it doesn't persist.  The next view of the object shows 0.0, 0.0.
>
> I have a report of someone who had a similar problem with grok.  Is
> this an underutilized feature that has a problem, or am I a completely
> delusional idiot?
>
> :)
>
> Of course, I wish to contribute to the BlueBream docs info on this
> because Attribute Annotation Adapters are a super freaking handy
> pattern which are far more lightweight than containment for ancillary
> functionality like commenting, rating, geolocation, etc..
>
> Best,
>
> Justin
>


More information about the bluebream mailing list