[BlueBream] Catalog IntId convention question

[Jonah Crawford]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Is it poor form to store an object intid as an attribute ?

I would like to catalog the name of an object along with both its intid and object reference as opposed to intids  (intid, objectreference) tuple.

This will solve some expensive lookup issues for me, but I just wanted to make sure there isn't a better pattern.

Thanks in advance,

Jonah
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
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=8Jac
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----