[ZF] Committers vs Committer members and getting more of each

[Benji York]

Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> I would define a quorum first and say "for a vote to be successful a  
> quorum of X% of the current committer members must have cast a vote"  
> and then a simple majority of the votes cast. That way it is easier  
> to produce a majority.

+1

An approach like that also helps reduce the impact if the foundation 
eventually acquires many "dormant" members.
-- 
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation