[Grok-dev] Re: ContainerApplication

[Martijn Faassen]

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
>> In most grok examples I see, there's always the
>> MyApplication(grok.Application, grok.Container) class. I know this was
>> discussed not too long ago, but wouldn't it make sense to provide a
>> grok.ContainerApplication as well, since it's what is going to end up
>> being the most?
> 
> -0. It's not that hard to type an extra comma and an extra "grok."

Do things break if you get the order of the base classes wrong? If so, 
that'd be a good argument for something like grok.ContainerApplication.

Regards,

Martijn