[Grok-dev] Re: Grok w/o ZODB

[David Bain]

This sounds good I notice that you begin to mention plugging in SQLAlchemy
or ZODB, if Big Table is the standard on appengine are you implying a ZODB
on Big Table or some kind of Big Table compatible SQLAlchemy?

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Tim Terlegård <
tim.terlegard at valentinewebsystems.se> wrote:

> On Apr 14, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>
>  Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, i've just posted about my package that lets you run Grok without
> > > the ZODB dependency.
> > >  http://blog.d2m.at/2008/04/13/grok-without-zodb-wsgi-based/
> > > I'd appreciate your feedback.
> > >
> >
> > I couldn't find a way to comment on your blog, so here's my feedback:
> >
> > * Currently you have a hard-coded root object that you import. It would
> > be much nicer to make it pluggable as a utility, e.g.
> >
> >  getUtility(IRootObject)
> >
> > That way you'd have pluggable root storages instantly (a ZODB backend
> > could register its root object as a utility upon opening the database, an
> > SQLAlchemy backend could do the same based on user input, etc.)
> >
>
> WSGI is a topic on the grok sprint. It would really nice if we on the grok
> sprint could wsgify grok and make zodb optional (but still being the
> default).
>
> Is it possible to introduce this root object utility in zope.publisher or
> wherever
> it belongs? Others have made packages for no zodb as well. I definately
> think
> we shouldn't need separate packages for this. Can this be added to zope
> core without refactoring too much and so everybody is happy? Can we do it
> on the grok sprint?
>
> /Tim
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grok-dev mailing list
> Grok-dev at zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/grok-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/grok-dev/attachments/20080414/1f1738bc/attachment-0001.htm