[Grok-dev] Re: Grok in Zope 2: Paris Sprint first day wrap up: Success! (Kinda)

[Martijn Faassen]

Lennart Regebro wrote:
> Oh, and we want comments on naming too. five.grokkers? five.grok?
> five.something else?

I think 'five.grok' might be a good idea, if it aims to look similar to 
grok. Instead of 'import grok', you can then do 'from five import grok' 
and expect the same base classes in there (or perhaps a subset). So then 
you can do 'grok.View' as usual later, even though the ViewGrokker in 
question may have a different implementation. If it doesn't have a 
different implementation (such as grok.Adapter), it's just an import 
redirect away.

That said, if this is somehow going to make implementation more 
confusing, there's always 'from five import foo as grok', so don't feel 
bound to this if you have trouble.

Regards,

Martijn