[Grok-dev] on the name "Grok"

[Wichert Akkerman]

Previously Martijn Faassen wrote:
> There is also 'plone.grok'. This provides plone-specific components and 
> grokkers, dealing with Plone specific concepts such as portlets. In 
> order to use it, you import from it. I think this name is very *wrong*. 
> It leads people to believe that these base classes exist in Grok, which 
> they do not. It's not implementing standard Grok concepts at all, but 
> extends Grok. It therefore the namespace shouldn't have 'grok' in it. 
> Ideally it's just something that is folded into existing Plone packages.

megrok.plone ?

Wichert.

-- 
Wichert Akkerman <wichert at wiggy.net>    It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/                   It is hard to make things simple.