[Grok-dev] Re: What would a megrok.z3cform (and a Zope2/plone.z3cform equivalent) look like?

[Martin Aspeli]

Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Hi Sylvain,
>>
>>>   I think megrok.z3cform would be nice,
>>>   So here like five.grok, we could make a five.grok.z3cform, if
>>> setuptools let us do so.
>> +1
>>
>> I'm not sure how setuptools would react if we have a five.grok egg and a 
>> five.grok.z3cform egg, though.
> 
> Just fine. You can also use a different name for the egg, there is no
> mandatory relation between the name of the egg and the namespaces it
> uses.

Sure ... but five.grok has things like five.grok.components. The 
__init__.py in five.grok probably doesn't do the setuptools dance.

What would happen if I had a five.grok.z3cform module (i.e. 
five/grok/z3cform.py) and a five.grok.z3cform package with its own modules?

Martin

-- 
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book