[Grok-dev] Re: Easier test setup with new grok.testing

[Uli Fouquet]

Hi Martijn,

Martijn Faassen wrote:

> I was initially a bit surprised they ended up in trunk, but you're right 
> - this is the only way to make people look at them.

I would be glad to hear of a more sensible way :-)

> I still think you should split the functionality into a z3c package. 
> Then you make grok depend on it and import the required functionality 
> into grok.testing. The whole API from grok's point of view stays the 
> same, but we can maintain it as an extension. This is similar to the way 
> z3c.autoinclude is going to work, and hopefully in the future also other 
> functionality.

Agreed. I'll do it this way.

Kind regards,

-- 
Uli