[Grok-dev] Re: grokcore.view feedback

[Godefroid Chapelle]

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:

>> So, we will eventually have:
>>
>> grokcore.component
>> grokcore.view
>> grokcore.viewlet
>> grokcore.formlib
>>
>> And we also have our eyes on eventually gaining:
>>
>> grokcore.security (right now folded into grokcore.view as that's the 
>> main bit that uses it)
> 
> Yep. I think grokcore.security would make a lot of sense, though it 
> would be very small. It would pretty much only contain Permission, the 
> corresponding grokker, and helper methods for defining checkers. I don't 
> think it should contain support for Role (because that's specific to a 
> particular security policy, as it happens, the one used by Grok).

Raeson why I did not move Role from grok to grokcore.view

-- 
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be