[Grok-dev] Re: STORM howto

[Sebastian Ware]

Just for the record. The benchmark that you referenced was disputed.  
It turns out that SQLAlchemy performed 400 commits for one commit in  
Storm and 0 (BUG) in GeniuSQL. Updated tests (note: by SQLAlchemy  
people) can be found here:

   http://techspot.zzzeek.org/?p=17

original tests as noted:

   http://aminus.org/blogs/index.php/fumanchu/2007/08/18/storm_sqlalchemy_and_geniusql

Mvh Sebastian

13 mar 2008 kl. 23.24 skrev Fernando Correa Neto:

> Hey :)
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen
> <philipp at weitershausen.de> wrote:
>> Fernando Correa Neto wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Martin Aspeli <optilude at gmx.net>  
>>> wrote:
>>>> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian (Klinger), Sebastian, and Brandon too:
>>>>>
>>>>> I just started a discussion on the Storm mailing list with some
>>>>> questions. I'm exploring whether Storm could make for a good  
>>>>> default
>>>>> relational database integration layer for Grok.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone done a comparison between Storm and SQLAlchemy? The  
>>>> latter
>>>> seems to be more popular (anecdotally) and widely adopted, and I  
>>>> can
>>>> attest that it's a joy to work with, but I've never used (or hardly
>>>> heard of) Storm.
>>>
>>> While ago I was evaluating both and picked up Storm due to its good
>>> participation in zope3 transactaion machinery.
>>
>> It isn't too terribly hard to do get SQLAlchemy to do the same. The
>> z3c.zalchemy package provides some code here, for instance.
>>
>>
>>> While doing that, I've
>>> found this [1] which showed the good and the bad from both.
>>
>> Would you mind sharing with us what [1] is? :)
>
> Yes :)
>
> [1] http://aminus.org/blogs/index.php/fumanchu/2007/08/18/storm_sqlalchemy_and_geniusql
>
>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Grok-dev mailing list
> Grok-dev at zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/grok-dev