[Grok-dev] Re: STORM howto
Sebastian Ware
sebastian at urbantalk.se
Fri Mar 14 07:20:32 EDT 2008
The only stuff I had to do outside python was:
1 create the database
sqlite3 /bla/bla/movements.db
2 create the table
CREATE TABLE Movements (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
transactionId VARCHAR(50), containerId VARCHAR(50), nodeId
VARCHAR(50), resourceId VARCHAR(50), qty FLOAT, conversion FLOAT,
variantId VARCHAR(50));
Then I had to define the mapping types in the object:
__storm_table__ = "Movements" # This is the corresponding table
in our DB
id = locals.Int(primary = True)
_transactionId = locals.Chars(name="transactionId")
containerId = locals.Unicode()
nodeId = locals.Unicode()
resourceId = locals.Unicode()
qty = locals.Float()
conversion = locals.Float()
variantId = locals.Unicode()
It wasn't too bad in my case, but it would be nice if it used the
definitions above to create the database. Automatic generation from
the schema definition would be cool, but then again, just not too
automatic... oops there goes the data...
Mvh Sebastian
14 mar 2008 kl. 12.02 skrev Martijn Faassen:
>
> The other point that bothers me about Storm is that they do not have
> a database schema abstraction in Python. It's not possible to
> generate a RDB schema from Python. They do not generate "create
> table" statements at all. Although they're not absolutely against
> adding such a feature, instead, they prefer and recommend people
> maintain their RDB the RDB way. While I agree that for many projects
> this is the right approach to take, I also think that the lack of
> such can seriously hinder agility in smaller/starting projects
> (where you just want to get going) and "demo-ability". In addition,
> I think SQLAlchemy allows introspection of existing databases, which
> allows for the generation of cool tools as well. Again a schema
> abstraction is helpful to support this kind of feature.
More information about the Grok-dev
mailing list