[Grok-dev] Re: is configure.zcml never tested?
Philipp von Weitershausen
philipp at weitershausen.de
Wed Mar 19 15:42:17 EDT 2008
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Typically we use functional tests to assert any kind of ZCML
>>> configuration. In the case of grokcore.component, this would probably
>>> be overkill.
>>
>> I actually believe there's no need for a configure.zcml at all for
>> grokcore.component
>
> Well, what about grokking the grokkers? I think configure.zcml is
> justified, though it would be very short:
>
> <grok package=".meta" />
Actually, this should probably be in a grokcore.component's meta.zcml.
So it seems you were right, after all, Martijn :)
More information about the Grok-dev
mailing list