[Grok-dev] Naming of grok.provides

[Kevin Teague]

On Oct 15, 2008, at 12:18 AM, Thomas Lotze wrote:

> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>
>>> But even with clearer documentation it's still somewhat confusing?  
>>> Maybe
>>> grok.registers is clearer?
>>
>> Or grok.register_for(). Consider this example::
>>
>>   class FooBar(grok.GlobalUtility):
>>       grok.implements(IBar, IFoo)
>>       grok.register_for(IFoo)
>
> I like 'register_for' better as well. How to proceed on this now?  
> Discuss,
> write a proposal, just implement it, what about deprecation of the
> provides directive? I'm willing to implement the new name if there's
> general consent about it.
>

+1.

I like 'register_for', it's less confusing terminology.