[Grok-dev] Naming of grok.provides

[Thomas Lotze]

Sylvain Viollon <sylvain at infrae.com> schrieb:

>   I don't want to troll, but I still prefer provides in fact. You can
> perfectly get the meaning with an explanation, same as register_for.
> People are not going to guess that directive, so you always need to
> say: to select which interface is _provided_ by your adapter, use ...

A lot of interfaces are possibly provided by the adapter, we need to
single out one for registration. This is the whole point of the issue:
we need a different term than "provide" to express that we single out
one interface from all the provided ones.

Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lotze · tl at gocept.com
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/grok-dev/attachments/20081023/33f4fea9/attachment.bin