[Grok-dev] template association - suboptimal magic?
Martijn Faassen
faassen at startifact.com
Wed Sep 10 06:43:54 EDT 2008
Hey,
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:35, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman <janwijbrand at gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
>> Just to be clear: it won't break in my proposal, since I propose to
>> still look in x_templates by default for the templates unless overridden
>> by a grok.templatedir() in the module.
>
> Wait, weren't you suggesting that we have grok.template() on
> everything? Then I might misunderstood. If it doesn't break, but
> solves the problem, I'm +1. :)
Yeah, that was my impression too, which is why I suggested the tweak
that 'grok.template' has default behavior as it does now even when it's
left out.
I'm +1 to the proposal if we have a default for missing grok.template()
that behaves like it does now.
Regards,
Martijn
More information about the Grok-dev
mailing list