[Grok-dev] proposal: splitting up View from PythonView

[Sebastian Ware]

How about "grok.SimpleView" which logically would be less specialised  
than "grok.View".

Mvh Sebastian

16 sep 2008 kl. 16.07 skrev Martijn Faassen:

> Hi there,
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Brandon Craig Rhodes
> <brandon at rhodesmill.org> wrote:
>> One further quick thought before I disappear until Friday:  
>> logically, we
>> should really name our two classes - if it's really a good idea -  
>> with
>> the names "View" and "TemplateView", since it's the more-specific,
>> more-specialized class that should get a qualifier, not the more- 
>> generic
>> one.
>
> I think practicality beats purity here. And backwards compatibility
> too. 'grok.View' should do what they're typically used for.
>
> That said, it might be we could fold it all under grok.View after all
> with a few minor tweaks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Martijn
> _______________________________________________
> Grok-dev mailing list
> Grok-dev at zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/grok-dev