[Grok-dev] proposal: splitting up View from PythonView

[Martijn Faassen]

Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> Sebastian Ware wrote:
>>> How about "grok.SimpleView" which logically would be less specialised  
>>> than "grok.View".
>> No, 'Simple' is never the right word for a class, as it's unlikely to be
>> true. :)
> 
> Indeed. Faassen's law states:
> 
>    Nomen simplex est omen contrarium
> 
> meaning that anything in Zope containing the word "simple" is actually 
> quite horrible and complicated (cf. SimpleItem, SimpleViewClass, etc.).

Cool, in Latin no less. "A simple name is an omen of the contrary". :)

Regards,

Martijn