[Grok-dev] proposal: splitting up View from PythonView

[Brandon Craig Rhodes]

Martijn Faassen <faassen at startifact.com> writes:

> Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
>> Sebastian Ware <sebastian at urbantalk.se> writes:
>> 
>>> How about "grok.SimpleView" which logically would be less specialised
>>> than "grok.View".
>> 
>> "grok.BaseView"? :-)
>
> Before we have an endless naming debate, we shall see whether we need to 
> factor out a separate view at all. JW and I will pair on this for a bit 
> in a couple of days.

I'm definitely -1 on the factoring out.  One grok.View is enough.

-- 
Brandon Craig Rhodes   brandon at rhodesmill.org   http://rhodesmill.org/brandon