[Grok-dev] post 1.0 Grok development wishlist

[Martin Aspeli]

Martijn Faassen wrote:

> * related to this, exploring a step towards more explicit directives, 
> less implicit rules. We could experiment with a megrok.explicit 
> extension which requires a lot more directives to be present.

What are the benefits of this? What type of changes would this involve?

> * ZTK integration. Grok and grokcore.* should use the ZTK packages, not 
> Zope 3.4 anymore.

This is the one I find most exciting. :) Getting Grok onto ZTK would 
hopefully inject some more momentum into the ZTK effort, and make it 
easier to re-use components across Grok, five.grok, Plone and other 
consumers.

Cheers,
Martin

-- 
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book