[Grok-dev] grok.LocalUtility and grok.site()

[Jan-Wijbrand Kolman]

On 2/23/11 14:13 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
> I vaguely remember there's reason for not having the second spelling,
> but I can't recall anymore what it was. Does anyone know?

Answering myself, at least partially:

Features like the "public" flag for local utilities and the "name in 
container" and more importantly, overriding registrations in subclasses 
of site object seem problematic to implement.

I'm trying anyway of course ;)

regards, jw